Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Emery Barron v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMERY BARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS (DOC/PA), KEVIN RANSOM, WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS, S. MILLER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR CENTRALIZED SERVICE and others
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Jurnak, et al
as 22-1536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD X. SUTTON, GERALD WIGGINS and THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JURNAK, Library Assistant, BERGER, Principal, S. MILLER and others
Miller v. Mason et al
as 1:2021cv01526
Petitioner:
Joshua S. Miller
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason, Pennsylvania State Parole Board Supervisor and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00564
Defendant:
L. Cronaver, John E. Wetzel, K. Ransom and others
Plaintiff:
Emery Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mason et al
as 1:2021cv00393
Petitioner:
Joshua S. Miller
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00530
Defendant:
L. CRONAVER, JOHN E. WETZEL, K. RANSOM and others
Plaintiff:
EMERY BARRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Zavada et al
as 1:2019cv00474
Defendant:
Angela Zimmerlink, Lt. Smith, Lt. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
William McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Luzerne County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00858
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Miller
Defendant:
Luzerne County Dept. of Corrections, John Doe, James Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Mooney et al
as 4:2017cv02342
Plaintiff:
Easkon Walker
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, S. Miller and Lisa Bolka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEIDEL v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE SEIDEL
Defendant:
CHRIS BENNETT, LANKEY, TOM HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
