Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PEW v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
ULLI KLEMM, THOMAS BOLDIN and VOTE SHEET MEMBER(S) JOHN AND JANE DOE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ULLI KLEMM, SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Warden Akinbayo et al.
as 1:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Akinbayo, Staff Lt. Warren, Staff Lt. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. HELMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00414
Defendant:
SGT. SHEETS, LT. DONADL CALLONS, C/O SGT. HELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIL JOHNSON and JAMAL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
King v. Zickefoose et al
as 3:2016cv00825
Plaintiff:
James King
Defendant:
Donna Zickefoose, Cory Heath, David Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adda v. Sabol et al
as 4:2016cv00530
Plaintiff:
Saad Adda
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, Clair Doll, Scott Koons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinnard v. P.A. D.O.C. S.C.I. Smithfield et al
as 1:2015cv02082
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Kinnard, Jr.
Defendant:
P.A. D.O.C. S.C.I. Smithfield, PA D.O.C. Central Office Employees, Lisa Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Sumter v. Department of Correction Camph
as 15-1967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WM. SUMTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION CAMPHILL, OF DIALOGUSIS FOR CLASSIFICATIONS OF NEIDY PROCESSED INMATES, I.D. CLASSIFIED STATUS SHEET REIGSPTIONS OF IDENTY'S
SUMTER v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA. et al
as 2:2014cv05692
Plaintiff:
JOHN WM. SUMTER
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA., CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, CHAINBERLANDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWINSON v. BLAKELY et al
as 2:2014cv01020
Petitioner:
LYDELL SWINSON
Respondent:
BLAKELY, ALFRED FLAME, MIKE WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
