Cases 1 - 10 of 6,235
Chi v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
Brooks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00914
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
VARGAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06693
Plaintiff:
MAXIMINO VARGAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MELENDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAYMOND MELENDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06507
Petitioner:
JOHN GUNTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06483
Petitioner:
TALEAF GUNTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06416
Petitioner:
IBN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN OF FAIRTON FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
