Cases 1 - 10 of 66
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. MCCAULEY
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
ANGEL TERRELL VARGAS, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. MCCAULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. PIPIK et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
TERRELL TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSHUA PIPIK, DAVID FLAHTERNY, EBONY MARCELLE-RUDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. SCUILLO et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
JAIMON TERRELL WOODS
Defendant:
OFFICER M SCUILLO, CAPTAIN T TRACEY and DEPUTY WARDEN J. PASSARELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tompkins v. Rickard
as 3:2023cv02006
Petitioner:
Terrel Tompkins
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALTON v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2022cv02860
Petitioner:
TERRELL WALTON
Respondent:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopson v. Entz et al
as 1:2021cv01944
Plaintiff:
Terrance Terrell Hopson
Defendant:
Harry Entz, Sheila Doe, Defranseco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLENNAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04948
Plaintiff:
AMIR MCCLENNAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TERRELL FELTS, JEAN CASTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMPTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02051
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TERRELL HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
