Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JONES v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS et al.
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMORE v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE AND PROBATION
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DUPREE GILMORE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE AND PROBATION, DR. LAUREL R. HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PABON et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CHCA EDWARDS, DR. BAIRD, PA STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS et al
as 2:2019cv04457
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS
Petitioner:
MARTIN WILLIAM JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nottingham v. Harry et al
as 4:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Matthew Welickovitch, Jason Cooley, Brandon Renner and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. AUGUSTINE et al
as 2:2019cv00894
Defendant:
MRS. BROWN, MR. JOHN, MRS. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
MR. WILLIAM JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William R. Jones v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 16-3947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI and CAPT. MOHRING
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03231
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv02707
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM JONES, III
Defendant:
SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH, CCS, MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv04493
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
