Cases 1 - 10 of 1,176
Wheeler v. Records et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Defendant:
NP William F. Ngwa, Centene/Centurion, VitalCore and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDER v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Defendant:
P. THOMAS, JOHN DOE 1, MR DUBISH and others
Plaintiff:
MANASSEH NASA CORDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DIGGS v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv04827
Defendant:
WARDEN OF B.C.C.F., JOHN DOE #2,, OFC. F. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN J. DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mbewe v. Delbalso et al
as 4:2024cv01508
Defendant:
A. Chapman, Correctional Officer Crawford, M. Dunkle and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Mbewe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph v. Greene
as 3:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
St. Remy v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Julien Michel St. Remy
Respondent:
Warden F. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. NUNEZ et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Defendant:
LARRY SHAW, MARK BROTHERS, LESLIE BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DANE D. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchard v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Respondent:
Clerk of Court Randall C. Lohan, Justice Karen L. Valihura, Judge Gregory B. Williams and others
Petitioner:
Andrew Hamilton Pritchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
