Cases 31 - 40 of 77
KING v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
as 2:2014cv04493
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL KING
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0153
JIN v. SUPER KING SAUNA NJ, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv04286
Plaintiff:
ZHEHU JIN
Defendant:
SUPER KING SAUNA NJ, LLC, TAE HEE LEE and KYUNG JA LEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TOOKES v. KING LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04124
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK TOOKES
Defendant:
KING LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC. and MICHAEL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BECK v. SUSHI MARU EXPRESS et al
as 2:2014cv03488
Plaintiff:
JONGWON BECK
Defendant:
SUSHI MARU EXPRESS, KEVIN KIM, HAK JAE LIM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KIM et al v. SUPER KING SAUNA NJ, LLC
as 2:2014cv02584
Defendant:
SUPER KING SAUNA NJ, LLC, KYUNG JA LEE and TAE HEE LEE
Plaintiff:
CHANGZHU LI, CHENGCHUN LIU, ZHEHU JIN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORENO et al v. PIZZA KING INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00703
Plaintiff:
JOVITO MORENO and ELMER LOPEZ
Defendant:
PIZZA KING INC. and NATALIE BRUSCO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TOOKES v. KING LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2013cv06509
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK TOOKES
Defendant:
KING LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND v. FOOD KING, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06649
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
FOOD KING, INC. , BARBRON, INC. , BURRO CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Joseph Resch, et al v. Krapf's Coaches Inc
as 13-3947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA M. KING, JOSEPH RESCH, SCOTT BEINLICH and others
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIZABETH MCNAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
KRAPF'S COACHES INC
KING-WILSON v. SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv01387
Plaintiff:
MARGARET KING-WILSON
Defendant:
SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
