Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LOPEZ AGUSTIN v. ABC CORP. et al
as 3:2023cv04010
Plaintiff:
EWER DONALDO LOPEZ AGUSTIN
Defendant:
ABC CORP. doing business as PHILS II SUB (REAL NAME UNKNOWN), PHIL ARCURI and MENY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
OLSEN v. RATNER COMPANIES L.C. et al
as 1:2020cv03760
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, DENNIS RATNER, PHIL HORVATH and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE OLSEN, CYNTHIA COLE, COURTNEY HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALLWEIN et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES et al
as 5:2016cv02049
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ALLWEIN , JOSHUA ALLWEIN , TONY BAILEY and others
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, AFL-CIO, DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
WHENRY et al v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
DOYLE WHENRY , JENIFER ALFREDO , CHARITY ANTUS and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN BEADER, JOHN LECHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CRUMP v. APPLIED LANDSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES et al
as 2:2013cv05574
Plaintiff:
KEITH CRUMP
Defendant:
APPLIED LANDSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES , ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA , PAUL MARTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LAGASPI v. PHIL-AM MERCHANDISING et al
as 2:2013cv01168
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DELEON LAGASPI
Defendant:
PHIL-AM MERCHANDISING , SANTOS FLORENTINA and OLIVER SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
COOPER v. AETNA HEALTH INC. PA, CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv03541
In Re:
AETNA UCR LITIGATION
Petitioner:
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
Not Classified By Court:
STEVEN A. MANNIA, CRYSTAL BITON, CHARLENE M. BITON and others
Special Master:
PAUL R. RICE
Plaintiff:
MICHELE COOPER, MICHELE WERNER, DARLERY FRANCO and others
Not Yet Classified:
KATHY TISKO, P.T. and ABRAHAM I. KOZMA
Defendant:
AETNA HEALTH INC. PA, CORP., AETNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
MELROSE-WAKEFIELD EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Klem v. The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan
as 3:2007cv00284
Plaintiff:
Phil Klem
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
