Cases 91 - 100 of 271
In re: Boris Boretsky
as 17-3776
Petitioner:
In re: BORIS BORETSKY
Respondent:
PROSECUTOR MIDDLESEX COUNTY
PETTIES et al v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2017cv12965
Plaintiff:
RONALD PETTIES and DOMINIQUE SELLERS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, VANESSA CRAVEIRO, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISTOBAL v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv09410
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CRISTOBAL
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, MILDRED SCOTT, KEVIN B. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv09410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al
as 2:2017cv09408
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, MILDRED SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv09098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CARTER v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 3:2017cv07711
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CARTER
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY CORRECTIONS, MARK J. CRANSTON, ABC CORP. 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEELE v. CASEY et al
as 3:2017cv07052
Plaintiff:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant:
ANDREW C. CASEY, JOHN JOHNSON, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MARTINEZ v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2017cv03605
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, RUSSELL CURLEY and RYAN TIGHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
