Cases 91 - 100 of 738,533
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06284
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BRUCE v. FRANCESCHINI
as 1:2024cv06279
Petitioner:
MICHELLE BRUCE
Respondent:
REBBECCA FRANCESCHINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06277
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MORGAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DEECK et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Ethel Deeck, GREGORY DEECK and ETHEL CROCKETT DEECK, H
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
THE REINVESTMENT FUND, INC. v. OLLIE RF LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
THE REINVESTMENT FUND, INC.
Defendant:
OLLIE RF LLC and TRAVIS ROBERT-RITTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RAZOR v. PUWAR et al
as 2:2024cv02149
Defendant:
LEETABEN RATHOD, CHETAN PUWAR and LEETA RATHOD
Plaintiff:
TICHINA RAZOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
