Cases 131 - 140 of 961
Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Steven Schwartz v. April Taylor, et al
as 22-1972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN ALLEN SCHWARTZ and STEVEN ALLAN SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
APRIL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
ESQUIRE ROCCO C. CIPPARONE, JR., LINDA LANE, JON LUDLAM and others
KOFFLER v. GRAYS LANE HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
as 2:2022cv01890
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KOFFLER
Defendant:
GRAYS LANE HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
IN RE: CARLTON LANE
as 2:2022cv01812
Petitioner:
CARLTON LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Alcatraz AI, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Alcatraz AI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Adaptive Recognition America Corporation
as 1:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Adaptive Recognition America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. COMMEND INC.
as 2:2022cv02391
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
COMMEND INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Procemex, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Procemex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Altice USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Altice USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
