Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 151 - 160 of 426,571
WARD v. UNIVERSAL STAINLESS AND ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff: Erwin Ward
Defendant: UNIVERSAL STAINLESS AND ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TERRICK v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LUKE TERRICK
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
CMPC USA, INC. v. GWSI, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff: CMPC USA, INC.
Defendant: GWSI, Inc., M. Gerace Enterprises, Inc., KEVIN BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv02080
Plaintiff: TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant: THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
RODGERS v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02089
Plaintiff: CANDACE RODGERS
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LEE v. MCDONOUGH
as 2:2024cv02088
Plaintiff: KATINA LEE
Defendant: DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SULLIVAN v. GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES LC et al
as 2:2024cv01244
Plaintiff: JEFFREY SULLIVAN
Defendant: GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES LC and MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
NAVALSKY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2024cv01238
Plaintiff: THOMAS NAVALSKY
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (AMTRAK) and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?