Cases 11 - 20 of 739,899
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Heather Ranee Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILLIAMS v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv06852
Plaintiff:
LAURA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ausherman et al v. Encova Mutual Insurance Group et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Donald Ausherman and Janelle Ausherman
Defendant:
Encova Mutual Insurance Group and Encova Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
River Road Jet Boats, LLC et al v. Rock Proof Boats LLC
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
River Road Jet Boats, LLC and Waimed Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Rock Proof Boats LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
O'Dell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Diana O'Dell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
ROMERO v. FEDEX CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv06764
Plaintiff:
ARELIS ROMERO
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND, CHRISTOPHER J. TAVERAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Blanca Sucuzhanay-Mendia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2059
Petitioner:
BLANCA AZUCENA SUCUZHANAY-MENDIA and N. F. S.-S.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ST. MATTHEWS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH WOODLYN PA v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
ST. MATTHEWS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH WOODLYN PA
Defendant:
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CRAMER v. BOROUGH OF NAZARETH, PA
as 5:2024cv01479
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRAMER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NAZARETH and BOROUGH OF NAZARETH, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
