Cases 11 - 20 of 249
Robert Gary v. FTC, et al
as 12-3732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. GARY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, AND IT'S EMPLOYEES, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
BUTLER v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2012cv04681
Petitioner:
HAKIEM BUTLER
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STACKHOUSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2012cv04574
Petitioner:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANN MILGRAM, GRAY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Gary v. FTC, et al
as 12-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. GARY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and its employees, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, Former U.S. Attorney, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Paul Chisolm v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CHISOLM
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM
In re: Brucestan Jordan
as 11-4217
Petitioner:
In re: BRUCESTAN T. JORDAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANNE MILGRAM, BRUCE KAPLAN and others
Nominal Respondent:
ANNE E THOMPSON
OSEI v. BALICKI
as 3:2011cv04273
Petitioner:
SULE S. OSEI
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adel Mikhaeil v. Angel Santos, et al
as 11-2899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADEL MIKHAEIL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL SANTOS, PHILLIP P.G. WEBB, DEALREE BROADY and others
MELLEADY et al v. BLAKE et al
as 1:2011cv01807
Plaintiff:
JOHN MELLEADY and VIRGINIA KEEFER
Defendant:
ALLISON BLAKE, KATHI WAY, DEBORAH WATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
