Cases 11 - 20 of 26
SMITH et al v. MB MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv11297
Defendant:
MARK NEARY, ESQ., JAMES M. MANSER, KATHRYN SHABEL, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH and BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv04947
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SMITH
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLAHAM v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv04788
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. CALLAHAM
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY, JAMES TEDESCO, III, BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
SMITH v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC.
as 2:2017cv02310
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SMITH
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
R.R v. PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
R.R
Defendant:
PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , DAVID KING , THOMAS LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CK Investments LLC et al v. Fisker et al
as 1:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
CK Investments LLC , David W. Raisbeck , Hunse Investments L.P. and others
Defendant:
Henrik Fisker, Bernhard Koehler, Joe Damour and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
ROHAN v. HARVEY CEDAR BOROUGH et al
as 3:2013cv04553
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY A. ROHAN
Defendant:
HARVEY CEDAR BOROUGH, BRIAN SMITH and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GENTILE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2012cv07013
Plaintiff:
JASON GENTILE
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, HOROWITZ, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
