Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LEMPERGEL v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2013cv07380
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT LEMPERGEL
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, BERKS COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESCHU v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2010cv03990
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT DESCHU
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell et al v. The City of Harrisburg et al
as 3:2008cv01563
Plaintiff:
Kate Bell, Kate Bell, Kate Bell and others
Defendant:
The City of Harrisburg, Charles Kellar, Stephen Reed and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell et al v. The City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2008cv01563
Plaintiff:
Kate Bell , Kathy Bacon , Jennifer Bryson and others
Defendant:
The City of Harrisburg , Charles Kellar , Tina Manoogian-King and others
Movant:
Robert Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCAL 54 PATROLMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION et al v. FONTOURA et al
as 2:2008cv03909
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 54 PATROLMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, DANIEL AMORESANO, CLARENCE ATES and others
Defendant:
ARMANDO B. FONTOURA, JOSEPH DIVINCENZO, JR., JOHN DOES 1 to 10 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CURLEY v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv04044
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT CURLEY
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2007cv01220
Plaintiff:
KRISTI SCOTT and CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
