Cases 11 - 20 of 300
Yusuf Bush v. Griffin, et al
as 20-3098
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN KONKLE, CASE MANAGER SHADE, OFFICER WOLFGANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUSUF BUSH
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-2699
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. REID
Antonio CruzIn re: Antonio Cruz
as 20-2209
Petitioner:
In re: ANTONIO LA-SHAUN CRUZ
Respondent:
DAVID J. EBBERT
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1590
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT
Defendant:
SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Plaintiff:
ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES, SAMUEL GAINES and others
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. REID
Nathan Railey v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3889
Defendant / Appellee:
SIS OFFICER BUEBENDORF, THARP, Counselor of B- Block Housing Unit of Lewisburg USP, DAVID EBBERT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN A. RAILEY
Chambers v. ("The B.O.P.") United States Penitentiary Lewisburg
as 1:2019cv02067
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bush v. Griffin et al
as 1:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Case Manager Shade, Counselor Griffin, Officer Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordon v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv01472
Defendant:
Mr. Watson, K. Sorce, D. Andrew Edringer and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen L. Jordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
C. Moore, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. Earp, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. Mississigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.