Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Dillman v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Marilin E. Dillman
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shakur Gannaway v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 16-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMP HILL SCI, LIZHONG, ADAPT INC, etc al, William Tillman and others
Konscler v. Schuylkill County et al
as 3:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Sherry Konscler
Defendant:
Schuylkill County , Schuylkill County Prison Board , Eugene Berdanier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Adams County Domestic Relations et al
as 1:2014cv02074
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Adams County Domestic Relations, William Gold, Susan Gantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Leake v. Jeffrey Dillman
as 13-4389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICKY LEAKE
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY N. DILLMAN
Edward Miller v. Eugene Berdanier, et al
as 13-3459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
EUGENE BERDANIER, PAULA DILLMAN-MCGOWAN and CAMP HILL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Ronald Lock v. Jeffrey Dillman, et al
as 13-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Lark v. Dillman et al
as 1:2013cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Lark
Defendant:
Dillman , Bennings , Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emanon Shannon v. Jeffrey Dillman, et al
as 12-4462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMANON SHANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Tyrone James v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 12-4514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE P. JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GENE JOHNSON, DILLMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
