Cases 11 - 20 of 34
PREACHER v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, ERNESTO J. MONGELLUZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, SARAH SIEGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEW v. NOEL et al
as 1:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
PAUL NOEL, CARL KELDTE, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
JESSE BROWN
Defendant:
OVERMYER, SHARAH, JENNA JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin McKenzie v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 16-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and others
TABANSI v. NOLES et al
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
SEHU KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
MARCIA NOLES and K. DITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUESES v. HAYS et al
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
KENNY MUESES
Defendant:
CINDY HAYS, KEVIN DITTMAN, DEREK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS V. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PA DEPT OF CORRECTION , SARAH SIEGEL , D. MECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. PA. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00757
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
PA. Dept. of Correction, Sarah Siegel, D. Meck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCAIN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CERSARINO-MARTIN, MAJOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
