Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Wenzke v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wenzke
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. GOLDEN TOUCH TRANSPORTATION OF NY, INC., et al
as 2:2021cv08634
Defendant:
GHI Transportation Companies (fictitious defendants), ABC Maintenance Corporations (fictitious defendants), John/Jane Does (fictitious defendants) and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTERA v. PRIME CARE et al
as 2:2020cv04691
Defendant:
NURSE JANE DOE - 10, NURSE JANE DOE - 1, NURSE JANE DOE - 4 and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BUTERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TSENG v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2020cv01121
Defendant:
DOE 14, DOE 1, DOE 5 and others
Plaintiff:
YILI TSENG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VASQUEZ v. ERSKIN et al
as 2:2020cv09309
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., GARNETTE H ERSKIN and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOUSE v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2020cv02683
Defendant:
SRGT MCGONIGLE, JOHN DOE #5, GABRIEL PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04754
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CAPTAIN JOHN DOE 11 and others
Plaintiff:
TYRICO BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SCHRUBY and TEEF
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
