Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MITCHELL et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2020cv02015
Plaintiff:
Virginia Ellison and CHRISTOPHER LEE MITCHELL
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ELLISON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04637
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ELLISON
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMOS v. ELLISON
as 5:2019cv02960
Defendant:
ROBERT ELLISON
Plaintiff:
IRIS RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLISON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01835
Petitioner:
SOLOMON ELLISON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, ROBERT GILMORE and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELLISON v. TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2019cv00823
Defendant:
TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TYRIE ELLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELLISON v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2018cv05329
Petitioner:
ALONZO ELLISON
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WISE et al v. BAYER U.S. LLC/BAYER U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01142
Plaintiff:
CHELSEA DEYARMIN, TASCHA FARNSWORTH, BOBBY HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
BAYER U.S. LLC/BAYER U.S. LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
EDNA MCCUTCHEON, ALISSA WILLIAMS, LEAH MANRUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
