Cases 11 - 20 of 823
VIRGO et al v. BARREAU et al
as 5:2023cv05059
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO M. VIRGO and STACIA SCOTT
Defendant:
DAVID BARREAU and PATRIOT TRANSPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FRANCISCO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 3:2023cv22775
Plaintiff:
NESTOR FRANCISCO
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco Grande v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2840
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ALEXANDER GRANDE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Garcia-Rios v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2806
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO GARCIA-RIOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
QUERENDONGO v. SCOTT KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2023cv03737
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO QUERENDONGO
Respondent:
SCOTT SCOTT KLINEFELTER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTY'S OFFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARAJAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20101
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ BARAJAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
