Cases 11 - 20 of 80
GANT et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv00251
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BARTLEY GANT and BILLIE J. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GANT v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
JEFFREY NASH, MICHAEL W. CARROLL, MRS. KNOX and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANT v. RAGONE
as 2:2018cv04228
Defendant:
DEAN ANTHONY RAGONE
Plaintiff:
EDWIN PAUL GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv13931
Defendant:
PEPPER, WILLIE BONDS, HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalif Gant v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 17-2559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALIF GANT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GANT v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2017cv00046
Petitioner:
JERRY L. GANT
Respondent:
THOMPSON and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gant v. Thompson et al
as 3:2016cv02310
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Gant
Respondent:
Thompson and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GANT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06485
Plaintiff:
PERRY GANT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tokyo Gatson v. Benjamin Mininger, et al
as 16-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN E. MININGER, JORDAN BENSEN, CARLOS MORALES and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DILKES
I.B.E.W. LOCAL 351 PENSION FUND et al v. ADVANCED ELECTRICAL, INC.
as 1:2016cv01954
Plaintiff:
EDWARD H. GANT and I.B.E.W. LOCAL 351 PENSION FUND
Defendant:
ADVANCED ELECTRICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
