Cases 11 - 20 of 64
LAWRENCE v. MOONEY et al
as 4:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
LIONEL S. LAWRENCE, SR.
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Trisha Kelley, Therese Jellen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PROVIDENCE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, L.P. v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv05147
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Defendant:
SOO B. KIM and HAM S. KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9604
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARKS v. CONIZEN HEALTH CARE, INC. ET AL et al
as 4:2013cv00726
Plaintiff:
Devine Marks
Defendant:
Conizen Health Care, Inc. et al, Teresa Law, L. Hams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARKS v. CONIZEN HEALTH CARE, INC. ET AL et al
as 2:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
DEVINE MARKS
Defendant:
CONIZEN HEALTH CARE, INC. ET AL, TERESA LAW, L. HAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCARBROUGH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44931
Plaintiff:
HAM SCARBROUGH, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
STROUD v. BOORSTEIN et al
as 5:2010cv03355
Plaintiff:
STEVEN STROUD
Defendant:
RYAN BOORSTEIN, ANDREW OCOTNIK, DANIEL BON HAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVERMAN v. GUBERNIK et al
as 2:2010cv02049
Plaintiff:
DARRYL LOVERMAN
Defendant:
HAMS GUBERNIK, TERRANCE MOORE, TOM NOON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAM v. AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv88636
Plaintiff:
KELLER M. HAM
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
