Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Brian Kelly v. Borough of Carlisle
as 12-4021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN D. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF CARLISLE
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID J. ROGERS, individually and as a police officer for the Carlisle Borough Police Department
Brian Kelly v. Borough of Carlisle
as 12-4020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN D. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF CARLISLE and DAVID J. ROGERS, individually and as a police officer for the Carlisle Borough Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59619
Plaintiff:
WILSON J. ROGERS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Daniel Slinger, et al v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 11-2963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL TODD SLINGER, JOANNE SLINGER and GREGORY SLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF MORRIS, MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
RODGERS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64487
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD A. RODGERS and RHONDA J. ROGERS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Timothy Hatten v. D. Young, et al
as 11-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D YOUNG, W. ZEGARSKI, J. ADIMI and others
Hatten v. Young et al
as 1:2010cv02660
Defendant:
D. Young, W. Zegarski, J. Adimi and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROGERS et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81179
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. ROGERS and VELMA M. ROGERS
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
