Cases 11 - 20 of 161
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. SHAKA EPOXY INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
SHAKA EPOXY INC. and J.C. KONO MOROSKY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA v. SHAKA INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01290
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA
Defendant:
SHAKA INC. and J.C. KONO MOROSKY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
NICKERSON et al v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.
as 5:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
KATHY NICKERSON and LAWRENCE NICKERSON
Defendant:
J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Anderson v. Shoaf et al
as 3:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Bennie Anderson
Defendant:
Doctors, Medical Personnel, and Employees of the J.C. Blair Hospital in Huntingdon, PA, M.D. Petz, J.C. Blair Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY et al v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04958
Plaintiff:
HAROLD RILEY and CAROL RILEY
Defendant:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P. and J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVERSON v. J.C. ORR & SON, INC.
as 3:2019cv00128
Defendant:
J.C. ORR & SON, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOEANNA M. ALVERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. SCHINDLER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv03971
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DAVIS
Defendant:
J.C. PENNEY, SCHINDLER ENTERPRISES, INC., SIMON PROPERTY GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
