Cases 11 - 19 of 19
James Rose, Jr. v. Glenn Guanowsky
as 21-3280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
GLENN GUANOWSKY, Esq., Counsel for Lehigh Valley Health Nework
ROSE v. HENRY et al
as 2:2021cv16873
Plaintiff:
REVEREND JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
MARCUS A. HENRY, JR., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, OSCAR O XAJAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE, JR. v. GUANOWSKY et al
as 5:2021cv00875
Defendant:
GLENN GUANOWSKY and COUNSEL FOR LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK
Plaintiff:
JR. JAMES E. ROSE and JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. MS. WILSON et al
as 5:2019cv02406
Defendant:
JENNIFER WILSON, MS. WILSON, SOCIAL SECURITY AGENTS IN THEIR PERSONAL CAPACITY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
James Rose, Jr. v. Mahoning Township, et al
as 12-3994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MAHONING TWP, MAHONING TWP POL, CARBON CTY and others
J.R., et al v. County of Lehigh, et al
as 12-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON ROSE, JAMES E. ROSE, JR. and ADRIANE MILLS, Individually and as natural parents, on behalf of J.G.R., A.S.R., M.J.R., and S.M.R., Minors
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, DONALD T. CUNNINGHAM, JR., LEHIGH COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES and others
Rose et al v. Roberts et al
as 1:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
James E. Rose, Jr. and Conciata Gabriela Rose
Defendant:
Heather Roberts , Mark Grim, Jr. and Richard Renn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROSE v. MCGLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2009cv03184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
JESSICA MCGLAUGHLIN, MARK W. MCGLAUGHLIN and BARBARA BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Mahoning Township et al
as 3:2007cv01305
Plaintiff:
James E. Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Mahoning Township, Mahoning Township Police Deparment, Carbon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
