Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Robinson v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00462
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman and Ms. Sipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as 3:2017cv02417
Plaintiff:
MARION ROBINSON and JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01509
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07339
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOIMARK et al v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2013cv04672
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOIMARK , ADDIS PALARDY and DAVID FUSCHETTI
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY , JAMES ROBINSON and FAMILY FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
Cross_claimant:
FAMILY FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
Cross_defendant:
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
THE STATE OF ALABAMA v. LUTHA JAMES ROBINSON, JR
as 2:2013mc00147
Claimant:
LUTHA JAMES ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
ROBINSON v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC,
as 2:2012cv05436
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. James Robinson
as 12-3258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ROBINSON
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2001cv41759
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43766
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
