Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Pierce v. USA
as 1:2016cv00525
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wallace v. Dauphin County District Attorney Office et al
as 1:2015cv02144
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Wallace
Defendant:
Dauphin County District Attorney Office, Jennifer Wisniewski Gettle, Dauphin County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. HOOVER et al
as 2:2015cv04878
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE WALLACE
Defendant:
TODD A. HOOVER, DAUPHIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DAUPHIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05851
Plaintiff:
RENETTA BARNES , JANICE BISCHOFF , JIMMIE LEE CLEVELAND and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRERO v. TRITT et al
as 5:2013cv03582
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE CARRERO
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jimmy Pierce
as 13-1790
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMY LEE PIERCE
Lark v. Dillman et al
as 1:2013cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Lark
Defendant:
Dillman , Bennings , Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHERRY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv04121
Plaintiff:
DERON CHERRY , HOPE CHERRY , MELVIN JONES and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ERVIN et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv02154
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE ERVIN and ANNETTE ERVIN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jimmy Gadson, Jr.
as 11-1689
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMY LEE GADSON, JR., also known as LOCO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
