Cases 11 - 20 of 28
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2013cv07877
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 2:2013cv06976
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J. T. SHARTLE and HARRY MOSKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 2:2013cv05606
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE, ET.AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55672
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROBINSON v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2011cv06074
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and PAULA T. DOW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCluskey v. Vincent, et al
as 11-2736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN MCCLUSKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARDI L. VINCENT, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, ELIZABETH NIGHTINGALE and others
JOHNSON v. CAPUTO et al
as 5:2011cv02603
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
EMELIA CAPUTO , VICTORIA GESSNER , WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00820
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54894
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON, III
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
