Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Roberts v. Lau, et al
as 1:2021cv01140
Plaintiff:
Larry Trent Roberts
Defendant:
David Lau, City of Harrisburg and John Baer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wonnell v. Lau et al
as 1:2021cv00817
Defendant:
John M. Vierling, Robert J. Spiegel, Stephanie Davis and others
Nominal Defendant:
Athenex, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Wonnell
Lau v. Penn-Mar Organization, INC
as 1:2019cv02153
Defendant:
Penn-Mar Organization, INC
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
YANG v. SOMCHAI AND COMPANY INC et al
as 2:2019cv12742
Defendant:
CHIN YING LAU, MADEE INC, AMPAWUN SILRAKSA and others
Plaintiff:
BAO YU YANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RLJ PARTNERS et al v. BEVERLY et al
as 2:2019cv08589
Plaintiff:
JTW GROW SERVICES, JOSH WEXLER, RLJ PARTNERS and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEVERLY, GROW SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC., LESLIE BOCSKOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YUAN v. JC 97 INC. et al
as 2:2019cv06739
Defendant:
JC 97 INC., LAU ALLEN and "ALLEN" LAU
Plaintiff:
JIN LIN YUAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TAKATA v. RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv02293
Defendant:
Riot Blockchain, Inc., Jeffrey G McGonegal, John O'Rourke and others
Plaintiff:
Creighton Takata
Petitioner:
Wai Lau, Riot Investor Group, JOSEPH J. KLAPPER, JR. and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Dr. Stanley Golovac
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
LAU et al v. NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv03245
Plaintiff:
DUNG H. LAU and PROVIDENCE RECOVERY HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA and ZONING HEARING BOARD OF NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAU v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv02208
Plaintiff:
WIEN YAN JAMIE LAU
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
