Cases 11 - 20 of 39
WILLIAMS,III v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS et al
as 5:2016cv04804
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
JANINE L. QUIGLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS et al
as 5:2016cv04805
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
JANINE L QUIGLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PA: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2016cv04563
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
PA: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLLE and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE MAHANOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
WILLIAMS v. ADAPT COMMUNITY CORECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2016cv04562
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
ADAPT COMMUNITY CORECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER et al
as 5:2016cv04559
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER, JESSE KIRSH and KEN R. WLOCZEWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS et al
as 5:2016cv04561
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS , JANINE L. QUIGLY and KREIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER et al
as 5:2016cv04560
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant:
PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER and BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NKANSAH v. AIYEGBUSI et al
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN NKANSAH
Defendant:
DOTUN AIYEGBUSI, BYRON DRAYTON, ROBERT LEE WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
