Cases 11 - 20 of 38
SMITH v. DEGOIAN
as 2:2019cv00282
Defendant:
GEORGI DEGOIAN
Plaintiff:
MARK SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Vincent E. Mooney and Melissa Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 3:2017cv06668
Plaintiff:
MARK SMITH
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC and AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. FASS et al
as 3:2017cv02466
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BARRY FASS, M.D. , DAVID SMITH, M.D. , STEPHAN KOSMORSKY, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
QUARASHI et al v. CALIBER HOME LOANS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv09245
Plaintiff:
MUFTI QUARASHI , HARRY JONES , GLORY JONES and others
Defendant:
CALIBER HOME LOANS INC., CENTRAL LOAN ADMINISTRATION & REPORTING D/B/A CENLAR FSB, M&T BANK CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
QUARASHI et al v. CALIBER HOME LOANS INC. et al
as 3:2016cv09245
Plaintiff:
MUFTI QUARASHI , HARRY JONES , GLORY JONES and others
Defendant:
CALIBER HOME LOANS INC. , CENTRAL LOAN ADMINISTRATION & REPORTING , M&T BANK CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SMITH v. COHEN
as 1:2016cv03459
Petitioner:
MARK SMITH
Respondent:
GERALDINE COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
