Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Harris v. Carvajal et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Edward Harris
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley, Herman Quay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jerry Graham
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley, Herman Quay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Joshua Kiddish, Lt. Bodge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv01934
Petitioner:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Respondent:
Eric Williams, Dr. Faisal Vakil Ahmed and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EWELL v. CARVAJAL
as 2:2021cv01543
Petitioner:
ERIC EWELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scholl v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01774
Petitioner:
Lesley Scholl
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hussain v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv01635
Petitioner:
Sushovan Hussain
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brennerman v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01610
Petitioner:
Raheem J. Brennerman
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brennerman v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01518
Petitioner:
Raheem J. Brennerman
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ-BROOKS v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv11307
Plaintiff:
DIANTHE MARTINEZ-BROOKS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
