Cases 11 - 16 of 16
CHAUDHRY v. BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06295
Plaintiff:
AHMED CHAUDHRY
Defendant:
BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC. , MATTHEW B. SALZBERG , BRADLEY J. DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
VRAKAS v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00579
Plaintiff:
CARMELO ORTIZ, LEEANN REED, ROBERT MYER and others
Defendant:
DAVID B. BURRITT, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, MARIO LONGHI and others
Petitioner:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 ADDITIONAL SECURITY BENEFIT FUND, SUPPLEMENTAL FUND FOR HOUSING AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES, WELFARE FUND, AND WELFARE FUND PENSION PLAN, DENNIS COLEMAN, PENSIONED OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
KELLEY PAYNE, OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, HENRY BIERYLA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC et al
as 2:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant:
ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC , RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA , SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Lee v. Pincus et al
as 1:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Wendy Lee
Defendant:
Mark Pincus , John Schappert , William Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jones et al v. Zuckerberg et al
as 1:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
Gaye Jones and Holly McConnaughey
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg , Marc L. Andreessen , Erskine B. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In Re: Schering-Plough Corp
as 12-8098
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION, FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
