Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN v. PETE'S PIZZA et al
as 2:2016cv05059
Plaintiff:
JASON BROWN
Defendant:
PETE'S PIZZA, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION and U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT OF EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS et al v. JAMES et al
as 2:2015cv01139
Plaintiff:
GLADYS V. PHILLIPS, PEGGY J. PHILLIPS, JOSEPH D. PHILLIPS, 3rd and others
Defendant:
RICHARD JAMES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Joseph Phillips, Jr. v. Richard James, et al
as 14-2768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH D PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD JAMES, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS FAMILY v. JAMES et al
as 2:2013cv01196
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPS FAMILY
Defendant:
RICHARD JAMES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Earl Pondexter
as 13-3451
Petitioner:
In re: EARL A. PONDEXTER
Respondent:
GOVERNOR THOMAS CORBET, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, GERALD ROBINSON, Chairman and others
Nominal Respondent:
NORA B. FISCHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
