Cases 11 - 20 of 28
YAW v. DONATE et al
as 5:2016cv04145
Plaintiff:
LARRY RAY YAW
Defendant:
JANINE DONATE , CAROL SOMMERS , STEVE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDING v. REMER et al
as 5:2016cv02700
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARDING
Defendant:
TONI A. REMER, JANINE DONATE, CAROL SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Miller, et al v. Coca Cola Bottling, et al
as 16-1905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MILLER and ANDRES CASTANEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
COCA COLA BOTTLING, SCOTT CHADWICK, WALTER O'BRIEN and others
COLLICK v. HEFFNER et al
as 5:2015cv05423
Plaintiff:
DARELL D'ANGELO COLLICK
Defendant:
NICOLE HEFFNER , CAROL SOMMERS , KAUREN FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALGADO v. DAWSON et al
as 5:2014cv05620
Plaintiff:
VICTOR SALGADO
Defendant:
TIM PEARSON, BRET EHRICH, ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTOS v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2013cv03134
Plaintiff:
ANGEL SANTOS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, DALE MEISEL, NANCY AFFLEBACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. SWEENEY et al
as 5:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
JACOB RAY RIVERA
Defendant:
EDWARD SWEENEY, CINDY EGIZIO, DALE MEISEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER et al v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
STEVE MILLER and ANDRES CASTANEDA
Defendant:
COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY , SCOTT CHADWICK , WALTER O'BRIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HARDING v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2011cv07370
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARDING
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, NANCY AFFLERBACH, CARROL SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2011cv06023
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL , NANCY AFFLERBACH , N. CARRION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
