Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Smith, Jr. v. Fogel
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Mathew Fogel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01422
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Connor
as 1:2021cv01244
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith
Defendant:
Jeffery Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Law Office of Eric J. Weisbrod P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv01243
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith
Defendant:
Law Office of Eric J. Weisbrod P.C. and Eric J. Weisbrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 1:2021cv01222
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Smith
Respondent:
Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and Warden of Franklin County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2021cv01181
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Jr. v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and Pennsylvania State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Franchi v. Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01198
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
Pamela Klein, Scott Smith, Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Thompson v. Speedway Motorsports, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01597
Defendant:
Speedco, Inc., B. Scott Smith, Sonic Financial Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
