Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Darrell PrinceIn re: Darrell Prince
as 20-2727
Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, also known as GOP and all satellite organizations and RONNA ROMNEY MCDANIEL, Chair of the Republican National Committee
Petitioner:
In re: DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Respondent:
ROBERT B. KUGLER
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. BOOCKVAR et al
as 2:2020cv03850
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, WILLIAM GILLIGAN, URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH and others
Defendant:
AL SCHMIDT, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BETHANY HALLAM and others
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. et al v. BOOCKVAR et al
as 2:2020cv00966
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CAMBRIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, INDIANA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOYCE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., MELANIE STRINGHILL PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Prince v. Republican National Committee, et al
as 20-2156
Defendant / Appellee:
RONNA ROMNEY MCDANIEL, Chair of the Republican National Committee and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, also known as GOP and all satellite organizations
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
In Re: Motion To Confirm
as 19-3998
Plaintiff:
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Appellant:
PETER J. WIRS
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
IN RE: MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
as 2:2019cv04072
Petitioner:
HON. PETER J. WIRS and DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Respondent:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
In Re:
MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Kamal Roy v. USA Govt, et al
as 12-2586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
USA GOVT, FACEBOOK, et al. and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
