Cases 11 - 20 of 31
TINSLEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICES et al
as 3:2018cv13795
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN F. TINSLEY
Defendant:
USPS, JOHN DOES 1-5 and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
JONES v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv04277
Plaintiff:
TINSLEY JONES
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TINSLEY v. PADULA et al
as 3:2017cv11427
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN F. TINSLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. PADULA , US POSTAL SERVICES and JOHN DOES 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
KING v. PADULA et al
as 3:2017cv05443
Plaintiff:
TANYA KING
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. PADULA, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AT NEPTUNE NEW JERSEY, POSTAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
TINSLEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv09217
Plaintiff:
WARREN A. TINSLEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 2:2016cv04102
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SHERRY YATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. YATES et al
as 2:2016cv04078
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
SHERRY YATES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. MAIN et al
as 2:2015cv07319
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
MERRILL MAIN, PH.D, SHERRY YATES, SHANTAY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINSLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2013cv04995
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TINSLEY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv06566
Plaintiff:
RUSSEL TINSLEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
