Cases 11 - 20 of 39
FLY v. UNITED STATES et al.
as 1:2020cv13962
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2019cv01009
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Administrative Office for U.S. Courts and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv01388
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, Administrative Office for U.S. Courts, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BINION v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 2:2016cv06078
Plaintiff:
KATEGIA R. BINION
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE , THOMAS P. DALY , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOBSON v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
KASEEN DOBSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BAIK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv03708
Plaintiff:
JOY W. BAIK and KYONG M. CHOI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, WILLIAM D. CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
KAUR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01755
Plaintiff:
HARPREET KAUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and DAVID SPRAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
PICONE v. NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2015cv01057
Plaintiff:
ADAM PICONE
Defendant:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
