Cases 11 - 20 of 194
WITMAYER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WITMAYER
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LeBOON et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv04391
Plaintiff:
PETER LeBOON and PATRICIA LeBOON
Defendant:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
COTTON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2023cv04953
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COTTON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Mark Brandt and Corey Schwalm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
