Cases 21 - 30 of 52
GAFFNEY v. XOLO TACOS 2, INC.
as 2:2019cv00711
Defendant:
XOLO TACOS 2, INC.
Plaintiff:
MIKAYLA GAFFNEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GAFFNEY v. KANDRAVI et al
as 2:2019cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. KANDRAVI, THE 401K ROLLOVER STORE, L.L.C. and EXPLORE FINANCIAL GROUP
YOUSE v. ALBRIGHT COLLEGE et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
JAMES GAFFNEY and ALBRIGHT COLLEGE
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL M. YOUSE and RACHAEL M. PLANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
GAFFNEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv17400
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
KAYLA GAFFNEY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BREITNER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15982
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WHITTEN, DENNIS BROXTERMAN, LINDA COREY and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv12233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GAFFNEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08740
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE GAFFNEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPSON v. MCVICAR et al
as 2:2017cv06037
Plaintiff:
HANIF HOPSON
Defendant:
THOMAS MCVICAR and RYAN GAFFNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
