Cases 21 - 30 of 249
DUTKO v. MOSER et al
as 3:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
MONTE C. DUTKO, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSEPH R. MOSER, CRESSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, CRESSON BORO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
MONTE Q. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Frank Monte
as 21-2947
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK MICHAEL MONTE
USA v. Frank Monte
as 21-2760
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK MICHAEL MONTE
USA v. Frank Monte
as 21-2701
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK MICHAEL MONTE
CONNELLY et al v. CONNELLY et al
as 5:2021cv03981
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR., T.P.C., III, E.M.C. and others
Defendant:
LARISSA C. CONNELLY, JULIE M. POTTS, POTTS, SCHOEMAKER AND GROSSMAN, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Frank Monte
as 21-2508
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK MICHAEL MONTE
MONTE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv09822
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MONTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00420
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Sanchez v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Alex Sanchez
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
