Cases 21 - 30 of 46
MUHAMMAD v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2013cv02364
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
FREDDIE HARRIS, JOSE ALVARADO, COSTA THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRINGER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv53092
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPRINGER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SPRINGER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34039
Plaintiff:
STANLEY SPRINGER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SPRINGER v. WILLIAM PENN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2011cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRIANNE SPRINGER
Defendant:
WILLIAM PENN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES and KELLY PANIZZI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SPRINGER et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62099
Plaintiff:
SIMON SPRINGER and MARY SPRINGER
Defendant:
A C & S, INC. , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPRINGER v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80485
Plaintiff:
LAUREL A. SPRINGER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SPRINGER V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv36415
Plaintiff:
RONALD B. SPRINGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Davenport et al v. Kneal et al
as 1:2009cv01694
Plaintiff:
Elmer Davenport, Eddie Dickens, George Betrand and others
Defendant:
Captain D. Kneal, Superintendent Shannon, Deputy Kovalchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSADO v. DOE et al
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
JERONIMO ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JON DOE, ROGER S. VIRGIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
