Cases 21 - 30 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WEISS et al v. SALAHUDDIN et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
JOEL WEISS and KALIMAH H. AHMAD
Defendant:
NYREE SALAHUDDIN and RAHIM SALAHUDDIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SALAHUDDIN et al v. WEISS et al
as 2:2023cv02837
Plaintiff:
NYREE SALAHUDDIN and RAHIM SALAHUDDIN
Defendant:
JOEL WEISS, 53 STEGMAN LLC, JOSEPH MARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
CRUMIDY et al v. WRAMAGE-CAPOROSO et al
as 3:2023cv02455
Plaintiff:
Betty Ellen Crumidy, Milan D Hoagland and MILAN D. HOAGLAND
Defendant:
CEO Robyn Wramage-Caporoso, James Hollen, Faith Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Toye Tutis
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TOYE TUTIS, a/k/a "AHMAD", a/k/a "MAHD", a/k/a "SANTANA"
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01596
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
