Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ellis v. USA, et al
as 11-3667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDWARD ROBERTS, Northeast Regional Religious Service Administrator, BOP, JAMES F. SHERMAN, Former Warden, FCI McKean and others
Blanchard v. Gallick, et al
as 11-2957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. BLANCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
G. GALLICK, Counselor, J. TROUTMAN, ROBERT F. WOLEVER and others
POWERS v. WARDEN WERLINGER et al
as 3:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
ROBERT POWERS
Defendant:
WARDEN WERLINGER, CAPTAIN PHILLIPS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 11-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMERAWOMAN FOR RESPONSE TEAM, H Moffatt Officer at USP Lewisburg, UNKNOWN ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, et al at USP Lewisburg, 1 ONE UNKNOWN CASE MANAGER, at USP Lewisburg Mr Giordani and others
Brown v. Edinger et al
as 3:2010cv02471
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
M. Edinger, R. Ramp, Mr. Carasquilo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 10-3758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT RODARMEL, Case Manager, TYRONE WALLACE, Federal Informant, E STEWART, Lieutenant and others
Brown v. Hepner et al
as 3:2010cv01785
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
J. Hepner, M Edinger, Ivan Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Brown v. Warden B.A. Bledsoe, et al
as 10-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
B. A. BLEDSOE, MAIORANA, REAR and others
Derrick Brown v. Warden B. A. Bledsoe, et al
as 09-4491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, C. M. MAIORANA, REAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
