Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Brown v. Fenstermaker et al
as 1:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dequillarae Zellou
as 13-1206
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEQUILLARAE ZELLOUS, aka Rae Zellous aka Strong aka Charles Brown aka Daryl Lewis aka Dequillarae Zellows aka Charles Warren
AIKENS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05476
Plaintiff:
MAURICE AIKENS , FRANK BERNARDI , TONY BERTI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DICKERSON et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv03338
Plaintiff:
ERIC DICKERSON , CHARLES BROWN , HOYLE GRANGER and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LITTLE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv02219
Plaintiff:
FLOYD LITTLE , REGGIE SWINTON , HENRY BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01256
Petitioner:
CHARLES BROWN
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Brown v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 11-3468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM and MARLENE ENEDY, ICN
Charles Brown v. Commonwealth of PA, et al
as 11-3133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and ATTY GEN PA
v. BROWN et al
as 2:2010cv78998
Defendant:
JESSIE CHARLES BROWN and CSX TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, DEBRA A. RHOADS and LT. ROBERT SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
