Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Kojo Mensah v. Duquesne University
as 13-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KOJO MENSAH
Defendant - Appellee:
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY, a Pennsylvania Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 249
as 2:2011cv01597
Plaintiff:
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
Defendant:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 249
Counter_claimant:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 249
Counter_defendant:
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CERTIFICATION OF CLI v. FAMILY SUPPORT LEGAL, et al
as 2:1997mc00048
Plaintiff:
IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF CLINICAL PROGRAMS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF LAW PURSUANT TO LR 83.2.3, STUDENT PRACTICE RULE
Petitioner:
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, BILL OF RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION CLINIC
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
REGOLI v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2008cv01466
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH REGOLI
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
