Cases 21 - 30 of 30
David Richardson v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 13-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN THOMPSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv01238
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, et al
as 11-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ and ATTY GEN PA
RICHARDSON v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2010cv02502
Petitioner:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, JR. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Ron Diehl
as 09-3627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RON DIEHL
Richardson v. Cuccinello
as 3:2009cv01543
Plaintiff:
David G. Richardson
Defendant:
Paul A. Cuccinello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
RICHARDSON v. DIEHL
as 2:2008cv01632
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RON DIEHL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON, SR v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91027
Plaintiff:
DAVID L RICHARDSON, SR
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RICHARDSON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2007cv04677
Petitioner:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDSON v. LATKANICH
as 2:2007cv00408
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
STACY LATKANICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
